U.S. patent number 3,852,763 [Application Number 05/311,984] was granted by the patent office on 1974-12-03 for torus-type antenna having a conical scan capability.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Communications Satellite Corporation. Invention is credited to Geoffrey Hyde, Randall William Kreutel, Jr..
| United States Patent |
3,852,763 |
| Kreutel, Jr. , et
al. |
December 3, 1974 |
TORUS-TYPE ANTENNA HAVING A CONICAL SCAN CAPABILITY
Abstract
A reflector type antenna which is formed by rotating a
generating curve, having an axis of beam direction, about a fixed
axis such that the axis of beam direction defines a beam scanning
surface corresponding to the surface of a cone. Scanning is
obtained by rotating a feed on the arc of a circle centered on the
fixed axis so that, due to symmetry, radiation patterns on the beam
scanning surface are identical for all feed positions. The beam
scanning surface so described permits an approximation to the
conical surface defined by a group of lines drawn from an earth
station site to points on the geostationary arc.
|
Inventors: |
Kreutel, Jr.; Randall William
(Rockville, MD), Hyde; Geoffrey (Rockville, MD) |
|
Assignee: |
Communications Satellite
Corporation (Washington, DC)
|
| Family
ID: |
26721573 |
| Appl.
No.: |
05/311,984 |
| Filed: |
December 4, 1972 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
44450 |
Jun 8, 1970 |
|
|
|
|
| Current U.S.
Class: |
343/761; 342/352;
343/840; 343/DIG.2 |
| Current CPC
Class: |
H01Q
19/12 (20130101); H01Q 3/16 (20130101); H01Q
3/18 (20130101); Y10S 343/02 (20130101) |
| Current International
Class: |
H01Q
19/12 (20060101); H01Q 3/16 (20060101); H01Q
19/10 (20060101); H01Q 3/18 (20060101); H01Q
3/00 (20060101); H01q 019/12 () |
| Field of
Search: |
;343/781,840,912,914,DIG.2,761,1ST |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Lieberman; Eli
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Kasper; Alan J.
Parent Case Text
This application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No.
44,450 filed June 8, 1970, now abandoned.
Claims
We claim:
1. A torus-type reflector antenna wherein the reflector surface is
described by a substantially smooth generating curve rotated about
an axis of rotation which is coplanar with the generating curve and
disposed on the concave side of said curve and wherein the
reflector surface, when illuminated with electromagnetic energy
from a feed means lying at a feed point in the plane defined by
said generating curve and said axis of rotation forms a
substantially focused beam along an axis of beam direction defined
by a line lying in said plane and drawn between the reflecting
surface and a remote target point, the improvement comprising:
a. said generating curve substantially comprising a conic section,
except a conic section which is the arc of a circle;
b. said reflector surface being formed by rotating said generating
curve about an axis of rotation which intersects the axis of beam
direction at an angle .alpha. which is not equal to 90.degree.;
c. said feed means being capable of illuminating said reflector
surface from one or more points on an arc, defined by the rotation
of said feed point about the axis of rotation, whereby the axes of
beam direction of beams formed and directed by the reflecting
surface intersect the axis of rotation at said angle .alpha. and
define the surface of a cone having a half angle of
180.degree.-.alpha. for 90.degree.<.alpha.<180.degree..
2. A torus-type reflector antenna wherein the reflector surface is
described by a substantially smooth generating curve rotated about
an axis of rotation which is coplanar with the generating curve and
disposed on the concave side of said curve and wherein the
reflector surface, when illuminated with electromagnetic energy
from a feed means lying at a feed point in the plane defined by
said generating curve and said axis of rotation forms a
substantially focused beam along an axis of beam direction defined
by a line lying in said plane and drawn between the reflecting
surface and a remote target point, the improvement comprising:
a. said generating curve substantially comprising a conic section,
except a conic section which is the arc of a circle;
b. said reflector surface being formed by rotating said generating
curve about an axis of rotation which intersects the axis of beam
direction at an angle .alpha. which is not equal to 90.degree.;
c. said feed means being capable of illuminating said reflector
surface from one or more points on an arc, defined by the rotation
of said feed point about the axis of rotation, whereby the axes of
beam direction of beams formed and directed by the reflecting
surface intersect the axis of rotation at said angle .alpha. and
define the surface of a cone having a half angle of .alpha. for
.alpha.<90.degree..
3. The invention recited in claim 1 wherein the generating curve is
a conic section having a unique section axis which is parallel to
the axis of beam direction and lies in the plane defined by the
generating curve and the axis of rotation.
4. The invention recited in claim 3 wherein the feed means
comprises a plurality of selectively energizable electromagnetic
feeds disposed along an arc centered about the axis of rotation and
lying in a plane of the circular cross section of said reflecting
surface.
5. The invention as recited in claim 2 wherein the reflecting
surface defines a 360.degree. toroid and said feed means is
deployed to provide a conical scan over 360.degree..
6. A terrestrial reflector antenna for scanning along a target arc
comprising:
a. a toroidal reflector surface, described by the rotation of a
substantially smooth generating curve, which substantially
comprises a conic section, except a conic section which is the arc
of a circle, and has an axis of rotation which intersects the axis
of beam direction at an angle .alpha. which is greater than
90.degree. and less than 180.degree.; and
b. a plurality of sources of electromagnetic energy for
illuminating said surface, each source being located on an arc at
an identical distance from said surface to form and direct beams
along said axes of direction whereby the surface described by the
axes of beams from said antenna to points on the target arc
approximates the surface of a right circular cone having a half
angle of 180.degree.-.alpha..
7. A satellite communication system, comprising a plurality of
satellites located in a geostationary arc, terrestrial antenna
mean, said terrestrial antenna means including stationary reflector
means for scanning along a target arc, which reflector means
comprises a toroidal reflecting surface having an axis of rotation
and a generating curve which approximates a conic section, except a
conic section which is the arc of a circle, and feed means
symmetrically deployable on an arc about said axis of rotation and
lying in a plane perpendicular to said axis of rotation, said feed
means illuminating said reflecting surface to form and direct one
or more beams along axes of beam direction from said reflecting
surface to said satellites, each of said axes of beam direction
intersecting said axis of rotation at an angle .alpha. greater than
90.degree., wherein said target arc approximates the geostationary
arc and the locus of said axes of beam direction is the surface of
a cone having a half angle of 180.degree.-.alpha..
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention is generally concerned with toroidal
reflecting surfaces for electromagnetic wave transmission and
reception. More particularly, the present invention is concerned
with providing a stationary reflector antenna which is capable of
scanning beams of electromagnetic radiation along the geostationary
arc.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Toroidal reflector antennas have been well known in the art for
their ability to provide rapid wide angle scanning of a narrow beam
in a plane. Antennas of this type are typically employed in
terrestrial point-to-point microwave communication systems wherein
a beam or beams of electromagnetic radiation can be selectively or
simultaneously transmitted from a common reflector surface to one
or more receiving antennas spaced along a wide angle field of view.
A typical system is disclosed in the U.S. Pat. No. 3,317,912 to
Kelleher entitled "Plural Concentric Parabolic Antenna for
Omnidirectional Coverage." The scan of the beams radiating from
this class of reflecting antennas defines a planar surface for
which the far field radiation patterns of all beams in the plane
are identical. Such an antenna is defined as having circular
symmetry in the plane of scan. Wide angle scanning can be
facilitated by moving the reflector feed in a plane which is
parallel to the scan plane to positions at equal distances from the
reflector surface. Thus, if the beam is well focused for one feed
position, it will be well focused for all similar feed
positions.
The toroidal reflector surface is generally defined by a generating
curve which is rotated about an axis. The concave side of the
generating curve is geometrically dimensioned to columnate and
direct the beam in a direction which is perpendicular to the axis
of rotation. A linear representation of the direction of beam
travel can be referred to as the "axis of beam direction." The
locus of the several axes of beam direction radiating from a
toroidal reflector is a planar surface. The equation of the
generating curve used to create the reflector surface may be
mathematically calculated to provide narrow beams, high gain
performance with a minimum of phase error and low secondary lobe
losses. The publication entitled "A Toroidal Microwave Reflector"
by G. Peeler and D. Archer on pp. 242-247 of the IRE National
Convention Record, Part 1 (1956) describes a typical mathematical
approach to designing the generating curve. Rotation of the
generating curve about an axis to define a toroidal surface will
provide a reflector area useful in forming and directing
electromagnetic beams originating from symmetrically disposed feeds
lying in a plane perpendicular to the axis to a plurality of
receivers located on the planar scan surface.
In the prior art, the generating curve is generally limited to an
elliptic or parabolic conic section having a focal point interior
to its concave side and lying along that axis of the parabola or
ellipse which extends from its vertex. Electromagnetic energy
radiated at or near the focal point will be formed into a
collimated beam and directed from the torroidal reflector surface
along an axis of beam direction which is parallel to the axis of
the conic section. Since the toroidal reflecting surface is created
by rotating the conic section about an "axis of rotation" that is
perpendicular to the axis of the parabola or the ellipse, the
surface is identified as a "rectangular" torus reflector.
The prior art also teaches that the generating curve for a torus
antenna may be the arc of a circle. However, because of the
focusing properties of an arc of a circle, the torus reflector
generated by rotation of the arc about an axis will not be a
rectangular torus. For example, the surface generated by the
revolution of a semi-circle about an axis through the vertex of the
semi-circle will define a sphere. It is well known in the art as
described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,406,401 to Tillotson, that a sphere
has an infinite number of axes and that the concave side of a
spherical reflector has an infinite number of focal points that
define the surface of a smaller sphere, or focal surface, of one
half the radius of the larger sphere. Rays incident on the
reflector will be focused at unique points on the focal surface
depending on the direction of such rays. For the special case of
the spherical reflector, the axes of beam direction will cross the
axis of rotation at angles which need not be 90.degree..
Accordingly, the locus of the axes of beam direction will define a
scan volume rather than a scan surface.
A description of the geometry and operation of the spherical torus,
parabolic torus and elliptic torus reflector antennas may be found
in the following prior art publications: (1) Antenna Engineering
Handbook, Jasik, McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1961, (2) Antenna Analysis,
Wolff, John Wiley & Sons, 1966.
For the rectangular torus reflector antenna, the feed point is
typically on a line which is perpendicular to the axis of rotation
and at a given distance from the axis of rotation. Scanning is
obtained by rotating a feed to positions along an arc of a circle
which has a radius centered at the axis of rotation and which lies
in a plane perpendicular to the axis of rotation. Alternatively,
the prior art teaches that a plurality of feeds may be located
along the arc of this circle to provide the scanning function
through selective energization of one or more of these feeds. The
same feed at different positions along any feed arc that is
circular, centered on the axis of rotation and lying on a plane
perpendicular to the axis, will create identical beams. Since the
prior art restricted the axis of rotation to a direction
perpendicular to the axis of the conic section, the beams formed by
the rectangular torus for similar feeds at similar feed points will
necessarily lie in a common plane which is perpendicular to the
axis of rotation.
Rectangular torus reflectors have an aperture-plane-phase
distribution which can provide gain comparable to parabolic dish
antennas. The gain is known to be a function of wave length,
variation of the toroidal parameters and point feed location. The
prior art rectangular torus has wide field of view capability
through its planar scan, and hence is well adapted for many
terrestrial point-to-point and radar applications. A low inertia
moveable feed or a plurality of deployed feeds provides the
toroidal antenna with an ability to produce a rapid scan throughout
a wide field of view. The stationary reflector antenna has obvious
advantages over moveable dish antennas which, because of their size
and weight are difficult to scan mechanically. In addition, the
torus is capable of simultaneously reflecting a plurality of beams
from a plurality of feeds over a wide field of view.
However, despite these attendant advantages, it has been found that
the inherent limitation of the rectangular torus antenna to a
planar scan severely limits the ability of the stationary reflector
antenna in many other areas of communications technology. One area
of limited application is that of terrestrial transmission to or
reception from space satellites having communications or
terrestrial observation applications which are typically located in
geostationary orbit. The geostationary orbit is essentially a
circle, having a 22,800 nautical mile radius, which is concentric
and coplanar with the circle defined by a plane passing through the
equator of the earth (orbit plane). It is characterized by a
satellite orbital period of 24 hours, the earth's period of
rotation.
The transmission of information to these synchronous satellites is
provided through earth terminal antennas whose beams are fixed on
the stationary satellite. Beams from the earth terminals require
steering only to the degree that the geostationary satellite
positions cannot be held in the face of orbital perturbations or to
the extent that the synchronous satellites are either moved in the
geostationary arc or are selectively illuminated by a single earth
station antenna.
Present earth stations use single-beam, dish or horn antennas whose
positions are continuously variable over large portions of the
visible hemisphere by virtue of a multiple axis, high precision,
servo controlled antenna mount which generally uses an automatic
tracking system. These antennas are necessarily expensive, and if a
plurality of beams are needed, more than one antenna must be placed
at the site.
Future earth stations, which will be widely deployed across the
United States, will require low cost, high gain antennas with one
or more beams pointed at satellites in the geostationary arc. The
primary beam positioning requirement of the majority of future
earth terminal antennas will be along the geostationary arc. The
rectangular toroidal reflector antenna described above would appear
to offer many of the desirable characteristics which future earth
stations will be required to have. Among these are simplicity, low
cost construction, multiple beam capability as well as high gain
and narrow beam width characteristics.
If the geostationary arc is viewed from a point on the equator
(i.e., a point in the orbital plane) then the required antenna
field of view is planar, that is, beams to satellites anywhere in
the geostationary arc will necessarily lie in the orbital plane.
The antenna beam positioning capability could be planar in this
particular case.
However, if the earth station site is moved from the equator, then
the antenna beam positions required to illuminate satellites in the
geostationary arc depart from planar scan. The prior art limitation
to planar scan, therefore, prevents the toroidal reflector antennas
from fully utilizing its desirable wide field of view capability.
At points above and below the equator, lines drawn from an earth
station to satellite positions along the geostationary arc trace
out a conical surface as is seen in FIG. 1. Assuming a narrow beam
width for high gain, the scan plane from the toroidal reflector
antenna would obviously be able to contact only a small portion of
this conical surface. It may lie tangentially along the cone,
contacting the arc at one point, or it may subtend the cone and
thereby contact the geostationary arc at two points. In either
event, the field of view is typically limited to about 20 degrees
of the geostationary arc. A system based on such a narrow field of
view would place significant limitations on satellite position and
connectivity. Bearing in mind that the contiguous 48 states of the
U.S.A. subtend about 60.degree. longitude, and that Alaska and
Hawaii add significantly to this range, an antenna with the field
of view more nearly covering the entire geostationary arc offers
some advantages.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is a toroidal reflector antenna formed by
rotating a smooth generating curve, which is not an arc of a
circle, about an axis that is at an angle .alpha. to the axis of
beam direction of a reflected beam. Within the spirit of this
invention, the angle .alpha. may be any angle not equal to
90.degree.. The resultant reflector will have circular symmetry
about the axis of rotation. The feed points of the several
generating curves describe a locus of points which is a circle
centered on the axis of rotation and lying in a plane perpendicular
to the axis of rotation. The axes of beam direction, and hence the
scan surface of the beams reflected from the toroidal surface will
describe the surface of the cone. The half angle of the cone will
be .alpha. for .alpha.<90.degree. and will be
180.degree.-.alpha. for .alpha.<90.degree..
Because of the circular symmetry, the reflector presents the same
shape to, and hence has the same beam forming capability for
identical feeds located at all points on the arc described by the
rotation of the feed point of the generating curve about the axis
of rotation. A single moveable feed or a plurality of selectively
energizable feeds located along the feed arc, when illuminating the
reflector surface, will form identical beams, the locus of whose
axes of beam direction describe the surface of a right circular
cone.
By properly selecting the angle between the axis of beam direction
and the axis of rotation of the toroidal reflector, the beams
transmitted from the antenna will define a conical surface which
closely approximates the actual conical surface subtended by the
earth station site and the geostationary arc.
Within the continental and contiguous United States, an angle
.alpha. of approximately 95.5.degree. is optimum. It results in a
reflector whose beams depart by less than a beam width for a
proposed reflector size, from the field of view required by the
exact scan cones for sites in the contiguous United States.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 shows the field of view considerations for an earth station
antenna located in the northern hemisphere and focused along the
geostationary arc.
FIG. 2 shows a preferred embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 3 illustrates a geometrical representation of a section of the
invention in FIG. 1 taken through the axis of rotation.
FIG. 4 illustrates a three dimensional embodiment of the invention
which would be capable of an omnidirectional scan of
360.degree..
PREFERRED EMBODIMENT OF THE INVENTION
FIG. 1 illustrates the field of view considerations of an earth
station antenna when transmitting to satellites in a geostationary
arc. The earth is illustrated as a sphere E with the polar
north-south axis identified as a line N-S. The equator of the earth
is defined by a plane (denoted as the orbital plane) which is
perpendicular to the N-S axis of the earth and intersects the axis
at a point midway between the north and south poles. The
intersection of the orbital plane and the sphere E results in a
circle which lies in the orbital plane. Additionally lying in the
orbital plane and concentric with the equatorial circle is the
geostationary arc, essentially a circle with a 22,000 mile radius.
Satellites orbiting the earth at this distance have an orbital
period of 24 hours, the same as the earth's rotation period. Earth
station antenna sites A1 and A2 are shown on the surface of the
earth. Station A1 lies on the equator at a given longitude and is
in the orbital plane. Earth station A2 lies in the northern
hemisphere at the same longitude as station A1 but is located above
the orbital plane in the drawing. Although the illustrated example
is limited to a consideration of the continental United States, the
basic principles apply to earth stations located in either the
northern or southern hemispheres of the earth over a wide range of
latitudes.
Beams transmitted from earth station A1 to satellites S1, S2 and S3
in various positions along the geostationary arc are shown as solid
lines which lie within the orbital plane. However, beams from earth
station A2 to similar positions in the geostationary arc are shown
as segmented lines and describe a surface which is conical in
shape, with the vertex of the cone at the earth station position.
The axis of the cone is tilted at an angle with respect to the
polar N-S axis, the angle varying with respect to the latitude of
the earth station A2. In the northern hemisphere, as shown, the
angle is a small negative angle, varying as a function of
latitude.
A rectangular toroidal antenna having a planar beam scan will be
incapable of accurately approximating the conical surface subtended
by the visible portion of the geostationary arc as seen from the
earth station site A2. In the case where the center of scan is
co-longitudinal with the earth station, that is the planar scan
tangential to the conical surface, it has been found that for beam
widths of the order .08.degree. to .12.degree., fields of view of
the order of 15.degree. to 20.degree. are available. It is also
possible to overcompensate by having the scan plane intersect the
geostationary arc at two points having longitudes different from
that of the earth station. In either event, fields of view of about
20.degree. are typically available with planar scan, allowing some
margin for satellite motion. Since the contiguous 48 states of the
U.S.A. subtend about 60.degree. longitude and that Alaska and
Hawaii add significantly to this range, an antenna with a field of
view more nearly covering the geostationary arc is desirable.
FIG. 2 illustrates a toroidal reflector antenna 1 having a simple
point feed 2 which is capable of providing a conical scan along the
geostationary arc. For purposes of the description of FIG. 2, and
in order to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make the
present invention, an orthogonal coordinate system will be
utilized. The torus antenna will be presumed to lie within the
orthogonal coordinate system shown in FIG. 1 in which the z axis is
parallel to a line extending from the antenna at the earth station
to a co-longitudinal point on the geostationary arc. The z axis
will also be coplanar with the generating curve 3 and the related
axis of beam direction 4 for the generating curve 3, as shown in
FIG. 2, however, as the generating curve 3 and the feed 2 are
rotated about an axis to form the toroidal reflector surface 5 and
the feed arc 6, the axis of beam direction will shift to points
along the geostationary arc which are not co-longitudinal. It
should be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, therefore,
that in practice the axes of beam direction will extend from the
antenna to points on the geostationary arc having longitudes
different from that of the antenna.
The reflector section 5 is mounted in the orthogonal coordinate
system such that electromagnetic radiation from the point of feed
2a lying in both the xz and yz planes will be formed into a
colluminated beam and directed from the toroid surface in a
direction PB along the axis of beam direction 4 which is, by
definition, within the xz plane and parallel to the z axis. An axis
R which is the axis of rotation of the conical section is shown to
be lying in the xz plane at an angle .alpha. to the z axis and the
axis of beam direction 4.
A planar section of the reflector taken in the xz plane in FIG. 2
will result in the profile shown in FIG. 3. FIG. 3 illustrates the
geometrical optics of the toroidal reflector antenna of FIG. 2.
The generating curve 3 seen in FIG. 3 has a shape which provides
the desired beam forming or beam shaping characteristics. The prior
art previously mentioned, teaches techniques for selecting the
proper curve geometry. Assuming the placement of a feed 2a or
source of electromagnetic radiation, at an optimum point on the
concave side of the generating curve, electromagnetic radiation
incident upon the concave surface is formed into a beam and
directed from the surface in a direction which is coplanar with the
feed 2a and the axis of rotation R. For purposes of describing the
preferred embodiment of the invention, the generating curve will be
assumed to be a parabola which, by definition well known in the
art, has an axis radiating from its vertex that is parallel to the
axis of beam direction of the beam formed from a radiation source
at the focal point of the conic section. Within the orthogonal
coordinate system defined in FIG. 2, the axis of the parabola is
parallel to the z axis of the orthogonal coordinate system and is
perpendicular to the xy plane. Viewing the radiation emitted from
the feed 2 as a bundle of rays, the parabolic section columinates a
fan of rays originating at the point of feed 2a and lying in the xz
plane, so that they travel parallel to the z axis.
In the prior art, an axis of rotation perpendicular to the axis of
beam direction and coincident with the x axis was used to create
the rectangular toroidal section. The angle .alpha. shown in FIG. 3
would be 90.degree. and the axis of rotation would be coincident
with the x axis. Rotation of the feed point about this same axis
provided toroidal circular symmetry. However, for a generating
curve that is an ellipse, a parabola or other smooth curve not an
arc of a circle, by defining the axis of rotation as being
perpendicular to the axis of beam direction all beams formed would
lie in a common plane for all symmetrically displaced positions of
the feed.
In accordance with the present invention, the axis of rotation of
the generating curve is defined as being at an angle of which is
not equal to 90.degree.. That is, the direction of beam travel is
not perpendicular to the axis of rotation R. Referring to FIG. 3,
the axis of rotation R is shown at an angle .alpha. to the axis z,
the axis of beam direction, where .alpha. is greater than
90.degree.. Since the curve is the section of a parabola, a feed
reflects a beam parallel to the axis of the parabola. The axis of
beam direction as well as the axis of the parabola are, therefore,
at an angle of greater than 90.degree. with the axis of rotation.
Since the angle .alpha. may be one of two complementary angles
formed by the intersection of the axis of beam direction and the
axis of rotation, a further limitation on the angle is
appropriate.
As the feed is rotated about the axis R to positions 2b and 2c, the
beams formed by the reflecting surface no longer lie in the yz
plane but trace out the shape of a cone whose vertex is identified
as B in the orthogonal coordinate system. For .alpha. greater than
90.degree. and less than 180.degree., the halt cone angle of the
traced cone will be 180.degree.-.alpha. while for .alpha. less than
90.degree., the half cone angle of the traced cone will be
.alpha..
By properly selecting an angle .alpha. to be slightly greater than
90.degree., beam scanning along the conical surface will
approximate the positions on the geostationary arc. It has been
found that for areas in the northern hemisphere, for a 40.degree.
field of view and locations between 30.degree. and 50.degree. north
latitude, an angle of .alpha. equal to 95.5.degree. between the
axis of the conic section and the axis of rotation of the torus
reflector is optimum. It results in a reflector whose beams depart
from the desired position by less than a beam width for the
proposed reflector size and for the field of desired view, from the
exact scan cones having a half-angle of 95.5.degree. required in
the contiguous United States. In a typical communication satellite
system antenna which embodies the principles of the present
invention, the generating curve will be rotated about the axis R
over an arc of less than 180.degree.. The visible portion of the
geostationary arc can be scanned by a limited segment of a
torus.
However, should the angle .alpha. be less than 90.degree. due to
the conical scan of the torus, a reflector surface formed by
rotating the generating curve by 360.degree. would provide an
omnidirectional scan. Such scan could be useful for many radar
applications. A three dimensional representation of such antenna is
shown in FIG. 4. There, the reflector surface is shown as a closed
toroid which is formed by a 360.degree. rotation of parabolic
generating curve 3 about the axis of rotation R. The feed at point
2a, located on a plane that is perpendicular to this axis of
rotation, illuminates the reflector surface with radiation. The
surface columinates and directs the beam, shown for convenience as
a line PB1, from the generating curve toward a target. The beam
PB1, will intersect the axis of rotation at an angle .alpha. which
approximates but is less than 90.degree.. The feed, when positioned
at points 2b, 2c, etc. on a circle, lying in a plane perpendicular
to the axis of rotation and having a radius equal to the distance
from the axis of rotation to point 2a, will result in the
generation of identical beams along beam axes B.sub.2 and B.sub.3 .
As shown in FIG. 4, each of the several beams all intersect the
axis of rotation at an angle .alpha.. The beam axes together define
the surface of a cone having a half cone angle .alpha. and having a
cone axis coincident with the axis of rotation. By comparison and
in order to further understand the invention, a rectangular torus
antenna, as known in the prior art, would result in a planar scan
since all beams would intersect the axis of rotation at
90.degree..
The beam direction for both cases of angle .alpha. greater than and
less than 90.degree. respectively is along the axis of the
parabolic section and makes an angle .alpha. with the axis of
rotation. Due to circular symmetry, all planar sections of the
torus taken through the axis of rotation will show the axis of beam
direction at an angle .alpha. to the axis of rotation. However,
within the orthogonal coordinate system, the direction of the beam
varies from the horizontal. As the parabolic section and the feed
are rotated about the axis R, the direction of the beam PB
generates a surface having the shape of a right circular cone.
Sections of the reflector surface obtained by plane cuts which
include the axis of rotation are all identical. Also, sections
obtained by planar cuts perpendicular to the axis of rotation are
circular. However, for the parabolic reflector of the preferred
embodiment, sections of the reflector obtained by plane cuts
perpendicular to the x axis will not be identical but, in fact,
will yield sections which differ from each other.
The focal point of the generating curve when also rotated about the
axis R will generate a locus of points which is a circle. In
practice the feed point and the focal point will not be coincident.
For example, to realize the greatest useable area for a specified
phase tolerance, it has been found that the feed should be placed
closer to the reflector than the focus. For the general case of a
nonparabolic generating curve, the reflecting surface may not have
a focal point. However, the position of the feed in these cases may
be optimally determined by one of ordinary skill in the art and is
not necessarily confined to any particular position. For example, a
plurality of reflected surfaces can be used, as is known in the
art. The feed in such case would be located at some point of the
optical system which is not the focal point of the toroidal
reflector 6. Typically, the focus of the parabola, the radius of
the curvature of the torus as well as the feed location are
parameters which are available to create a phase distribution which
is most nearly uniform.
Based upon the present invention, a plurality of stationary conical
scan, torus antennas may be deployed across a large geographical
area such as the United States and used to communicate singly or
simultaneously, with satellites located in geostationary orbit. It
should be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art that
plurality of such terrestrial antennas could become a part of a
communications distribution system useful in providing simultaneous
communications between one terrestrial antenna and a plurality of
other antennas via satellites in geostationary orbit.
It should be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art that the
principle of the present invention, though discussed with respect
to terrestrial transmission to satellites in geostationary orbit by
diverging electromagnetic radiation from a feed, are also
applicable to the reception of electromagnetic radiation by the
antenna. The parameters of the system would be varied to facilitate
the convergance of electromagnetic radiation by the reflector
antenna.
It also should be obvious that the generating curve as well as the
feed and reflective characteristics of the conical torus antenna
may be varied in accordance with the teachings of the prior art to
provide the desired beam widths, beam shapes or scanning
capabilities required by a transmitting or receiving system. The
prior art recognizes that for a rectangular torus reflector the
generating curve may be a paraboloid, an ellipse or any other
smooth planar curve that allows beam shaping in the plane normal to
the plane of scan. The fundamental principles of curve selection
applicable to the rectangular torus reflector are applicable to the
torus reflector capable of a conical scan which is the subject of
the present invention.
* * * * *