U.S. patent number 3,816,996 [Application Number 05/309,201] was granted by the patent office on 1974-06-18 for grinding machine.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Cincinnati Milacron-Heald Corp.. Invention is credited to Herbert R. Uhtenwoldt.
| United States Patent |
3,816,996 |
| Uhtenwoldt |
June 18, 1974 |
GRINDING MACHINE
Abstract
A grinding machine for forming a non-circular surface on a
workpiece and means for preventing mis-formation of the surface due
to lack of normalcy between the master cam and the cam
follower.
|
Inventors: |
Uhtenwoldt; Herbert R.
(Worcester, MA) |
|
Assignee: |
Cincinnati Milacron-Heald Corp.
(Worcester, MA)
|
| Family
ID: |
23197138 |
| Appl.
No.: |
05/309,201 |
| Filed: |
November 24, 1972 |
| Current U.S.
Class: |
451/239; 451/23;
451/919 |
| Current CPC
Class: |
B24B
19/095 (20130101); B23Q 23/00 (20130101); B23Q
35/103 (20130101); B23Q 35/185 (20130101); Y10S
451/919 (20130101) |
| Current International
Class: |
B23Q
23/00 (20060101); B23Q 35/10 (20060101); B23Q
35/00 (20060101); B23Q 35/18 (20060101); B24B
19/09 (20060101); B24B 19/00 (20060101); B24b
017/02 (); B24b 005/16 () |
| Field of
Search: |
;51/11R,165R,165.77,165.79,165.89 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Smith; Al Lawrence
Assistant Examiner: Smith, Jr.; Harold P.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Blodgett; Norman S. Blodgett; Gerry
A.
Claims
The invention having been thus described, what is claimed as new
and desired to secure by Letters Patent is:
1. A grinding machine for forming a non-circular surface on a
workpiece, comprising
a. a base having a plane surface,
b. a table mounted on the said surface of the base for sliding
movement in any direction in that plane,
c. a workhead rotatably located in the table for supporting and
rotating the workpiece,
d. a master cam mounted on the workhead and having a surface
representative of the said surface to be formed,
e. a wheelhead mounted on the base for operative movement relative
to the workhead and having an abrasive wheel for generating the
said surface,
f. a cam follower for engaging the said surface of the master
cam,
g. means joining the cam follower to the base to cause the cam
follower and the abrasive wheel to move in the approximate path of
the said surface of the master cam, and
h. a link joining the table to the base to correct variations in
normalcy during the rotation of the workhead.
2. A grinding machine as recited in claim 1, wherein the workhead
is provided with a gear concentric with an axis through the center
of rotation thereof, and wherein the table is provided with a motor
driving a pinion gear which in turn drives the workhead gear in a
ratio of a whole integer.
3. A grinding machine as recited in claim 2, wherein the link is
attached to the pinion gear at a point spaced from its center of
rotation.
4. A grinding machine as recited in claim 3, wherein the length of
the link is adjustable by virtue of an extensible hydraulic
cylinder whose length is determined by a secondary cam mounted on
and rotatable with the pinion gear.
5. A grinding machine as recited in claim 4, wherein the secondary
cam operates a hydraulic cylinder which is connected by hydraulic
lines to operate the cylinder in the link.
6. A grinding machine as recited in claim 1, wherein the base is
provided with a pivot shaft that extends into the table and
provides for the rotation of the table about an axis passing
through the point of contact of the cam follower with the master
cam.
7. A grinding machine as recited in claim 6, wherein the table
includes an outer portion on which the workhead is mounted and an
inner portion in which the pivot shaft is pivotally mounted, the
outer and inner portions being joined for linear movement only
therebetween parallel to the said surface of the base.
8. A grinding machine as recited in claim 6, wherein the base is
provided with a sub-base from which the pivot shaft extends, the
sub-base being linearly slidable mounted in the base, the relative
position between the base and sub-base is selectable by means of a
motor-driven feed screw.
9. A grinding machine as recited in claim 1, wherein the abrasive
wheel consists of two non-coextensive portions mounted on the same
spindle, one portion being intended for rough grinding and the
other for finish grinding.
10. A grinding machine as recited in claim 9, wherein means is
provided for retaining the difference in size of the two portions
for the purpose of regulating feeding and compensation.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
It is common practice to form non-circular surfaces by use of the
abrasive machining process. Generally speaking, the master cam is
used to guide the relative motion between the workpiece and the
grinding wheel in such a manner as to duplicate the master cam
surface on the workpiece. In order to obtain an accuracy in this
operation, it is desirable that a situation known as "normalcy" be
maintained. This is defined as moving the master cam past the cam
follower in such a way that the point of contact between the cam
follower and the master cam surface and the center of the cam
follower lie in the same plane at all times. This means that,
similarly, the force between the workpiece and the grinding wheel
remains in the same direction during the entire cycle of rotation
of the master cam, so that the grinding wheel cuts always on the
same line, namely where it is dressed and runs true.
Experience with grinding spindles shows that the grinding wheel
runs true only in the line where it was dressed. Maintaining
normalcy also allows wheel wear without part shape distortion due
to "R-.alpha. error". This condition of normalcy is particularly
useful in grinding the housing of the so-called "Wankel engine" in
which a "figure eight" chamber (known as a "epitrochoid") is formed
and there are some areas of the surface which have a high rate of
angular change, both inwardly and outwardly of a basic circle. One
way of accomplishing this is shown in the U.S. Pat. of Davies No.
2,421,548 where the master cam is made in the shape of an annulus
with a drive roller on one side and a cam follower on the other
side, the master cam being driven by one of the rollers. The master
cam snakes its way between the two rollers, thus maintaining
theoretical normalcy. A similar method of accomplishing this is
shown in the Appleton et al U.S. Pat. No. 3,259,021 where the metal
removing tool is a milling cutter but the master cam is an annulus
which snakes its way through a group of rollers to maintain
normalcy. Similarly, in the U.S. Pat. of Hoglund No. 3,663,188, the
master cam is also in the form of an annulus which snakes it way
between a drive roll and an idler roll or a pair or idler rolls to
maintain normalcy. All of these constructions have the handicap
that the driving of the master cam takes place through frictional
contact with a roll. The wearing of the frictional roll causes
inaccuracy in the grinding operation and the driving force (not
being positive) is limited by the friction available. In the case
of an engine housing, for instance, the normal tolerance would be
0.001 inch. In order to maintain this with the prior art cam
grinders, it was necessary to operate at a very low speed with
small amounts of metal removal. In a modern industrial plant, it is
necessary not only to rotate the workpiece at a high rate of speed,
but to remove a great deal of metal at the same time with low
workspeed (creep feed for roughing). In the prior art the devices
are simply not capable of transmitting sufficient horsepower to the
rotation and movement of the cam and of the workpiece to produce
such a high production operation.
Furthermore, the passage of sharp changes in radius of curvature
through the guiding rolls (which are the principal operative
mechanism of the prior art cam grinders) tends to injure the
machinery, because these rolls must be relatively small in diameter
and be mounted in bearings and the bearings are subjected to
extreme shock as the rapid rate of change of radius of curvature
takes place. The machines, therefore, are difficult to maintain in
operation and require constant maintenance and replacement of
bearings. These and other difficulties experienced with the prior
art devices have been obviated in a novel manner by the present
invention.
It is, therefore, an outstanding object of the invention to provide
a grinding machine for generating a non-circular surface on a
workpiece in which exact normalcy is maintained, while large
amounts of power are available for the movement of the master cam
and workpiece.
Another object of the present invention is the provision of a cam
grinder in which the rolls which are subject to contact with the
master cam surface are not subjected to wear.
A further object of the present invention is the provision of a cam
grinder in which a no frictional driving action takes place against
a master cam surface.
It is another object of the instant invention to provide a grinding
machine for grinding cam-like workpieces in which the main drive of
the workpiece and master cam takes place through conventional
gearing and in which additional motion is provided to maintain
precise normalcy.
A still further object of the invention is the provision of a cam
grinder which is capable of high precision and heavy industrial
production operation with a minimum of wear on the parts and
requiring a minimum of maintenance and replacement of parts.
It is a further object of the invention to provide a grinding
machine for producing cam-like articles which is capable of heavy
duty industrial production usage, making use of relatively
unskilled labor.
Another object of the invention is the provision of a cam grinder
in which normalcy is produced by a direct drive, rather than a
frictional drive, so that no wear or slippage takes place.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In general, the invention consists of a grinding machine for
forming a non-circular surface on a workpiece having a base with a
plane surface and having a table mounted on the said surface of the
base for slidable movement in any direction in that plane. A
workhead is rotatably located in the table for supporting and
rotating the workpiece and a master cam is mounted on the workhead
and has a surface representative of the surface to be formed. A
wheelhead is mounted on the base for operative movement relative to
the workhead and has an abrasive wheel for generating the said
surface. A cam follower is provided for engaging the surface of the
master cam and means is provided for joining the cam follower to
the base to cause the cam follower and the abrasive wheel to move
in the approximate path of the said surface of the master cam. A
link joins the base to the table to correct variation in normalcy
encountered during the rotation of the workhead.
More specifically, the workhead is provided with a gear concentric
with an axis through the center of the workpiece and through the
center of rotation thereof. The table is provided with a motor
driving a one-half size pinion gear which, in turn, drives the
workhead gear in a ratio of 2-to-1. A link is attached to the
pinion gear at a point spaced from its center of rotation. The
length of the link is adjustable by virtue of an extensible
hydraulic cylinder whose length is determined by a secondary cam
mounted on and rotatable with the pinion gear.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The character of the invention, however, may be best understood by
reference to one of its structural forms, as illustrated by the
accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a grinding machine embodying the
principles of the present invention,
FIG. 2 is a plan view of the grinding machine,
FIG. 3 is a vertical sectional view of the grinding machine taken
on the line II--II of FIG. 2,
FIG. 4 is a vertical sectional view of the machine taken on the
line III--III of FIG. 3,
FIG. 5 is a diagram showing the kinematic relationship of the parts
of the machine,
FIG. 6 is a diagram of a grinding machine in which an approximation
of normalcy is maintained by use of a plain crank,
FIG. 7 is a diagram of the present grinding machine showing how
precise normalcy is obtained with a compensation,
FIG. 8 is a diagram showing normality error,
FIG. 9 is a diagram showing geometry error,
FIGS. 10-16 are electrical diagrams of circuitry used to obtain the
grinding cycle, and
FIG. 17 is a diagrammatic representation showing the concept of
normality and the way that the point of contact changes with wheel
size.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Referring first to FIG. 1, wherein are best shown the general
features of the invention, the grinding machine indicated generally
by the reference numberal 10, is shown as supporting a workpiece 11
on which a non-circular surface 12 is to be formed. In the
illustration the workpiece is shown as the stator of a Wankel
engine in which the surface 12 is a epitrochoid. The machine is
provided with a base 13, having a plane upper horizontal surface 14
on which is mounted a table 15. A wheelhead 22 is mounted on a
column 20 extending upwardly on the base. The wheelhead is provided
with a spindle 23 on the outer end of which is mounted an abrasive
wheel 24. Suitable guides and actuating mechanism are provided to
mount the wheel on the base for operative movement relative to a
workhead 17, extending upwardly from the table 15, and to the
workpiece 11 so that the abrasive wheel 24 can generate the said
surface 12. Generally speaking, movement parallel to the axis of
the abrasive wheel 24, takes place by movement of the wheelhead 22
vertically, while feeding movements transverse to the axis take
place by movement of the table 15 under the impetus of a motor 30.
The kinematic diagram shown in FIG. 5 shows the various motions of
the mechanism. Important points in the apparatus are indicated by
their reference numerals, including the connecting rod anchor point
55, the axis 56 of the gear 31, the axis of the crank end 34, and
the locus of the center of the crank worm gear 36. It can be seen
that by laying out the locus 57 of the center of the epitrochoid as
will be desirable to maintain normality, it is possible by
conventional descriptive geometry methods to obtain the locus 58 of
the center of the crank worm gear 36 necessary to obtain that
angular motion of the table 15 necessary to produce the epitrochoid
normality. One goes from the locus 58 to the locus 59 to the path
the crank end 34 must take and thus you have a pattern for use in
demonstrating the change in the length of the crank 29 produced by
the hydraulic cylinder 38 in order to obtain normalcy. This pattern
is transferred to the cam 39 which controls the cylinder 38.
Referring now to FIG. 2, wherein are also shown the general
features of the invention, the grinding machine is shown as
supporting the workpiece 11. It can be seen that the base 13 has
the plane upper horizontal surface 14 on which is mounted the table
15. The underside of the table is provided with hydrostatic pockets
16 by which means the table is mounted on the said upper surface of
the base for slidable movement in any direction in the plane of the
surface. The workhead 17 is mounted in the table 15 in bearings 18
and it serves to support and rotate the workpiece 11.
Suitable clamping means is used for attaching the workpiece 11 to
the workhead, but these are well known in the art and are not shown
in the drawings in order to permit simplicity of explanation. At
the lower end of the workhead 17 is mounted a master cam 19 having
an internal surface 21 which is representative of the
previously-mentioned surface 12 to be formed on the workpiece.
A cam follower 25 extends upwardly from the base 13 to engage the
surface 21 of the master cam. The cam follower is rotatably mounted
on bearings 26 carried on a spindle 27 extending upwardly from the
upper end of a pivot shaft 28, which itself extends downwardly into
the base 13. The fact that the cam follower 25 and the abrasive
wheel 24 are fixed relative to the base 13, causes the table 15,
the workhead 17, and the workpiece 11 to move over the surface 14
relative to the base 13 in a manner dictated by the shape of the
master cam surface 21.
A link 29 joins the base 13 to the table 15 to correct variations
in normalcy occasionally during the rotation of the workhead 17.
The workhead 17 is provided with a gear 31 which is concentric with
an axis A-A through the center of rotation thereof. The table 15 is
provided with a motor 32 which drives a pinion gear 33 which, in
turn, drives the workhead gear 31. The link 29 is attached to the
pinion gear 33 by means of a pin 34 at a point spaced from the
center of rotation of the gear. The gear, incidentally, is mounted
on a vertical shaft 35 having at its upper end a worm pinion 36
engaged by a worm 37 mounted on the shaft of the motor 32. The
length of the link is made adjustable by virtue of an extensible
hydraulic cylinder 38 whose length is determined by a secondary cam
39, bolted to the underside of the gear 33 and rotatable with it.
The secondary cam 39 operates a hydraulic cylinder 41 which is
connected by hydraulic lines 42 and 43 to operate the cylinder 38
in the link 29.
As has been mentioned, the base 13 is provided with a pivot shaft
28 that extends into the table 15 and provides for the rotation of
the table about an axis B-B passing through the point of contact of
the cam follower 25 with the surface 21 of the master cam 19. The
table 15 includes an outer portion 44 on which the workhead 17 is
mounted and an inner portion 45 in which the pivot shaft 28 is
pivotally mounted. The outer and inner portions are joined for
linear movement only therebetween parallel to the surface 14 of the
base. For this purpose guide ways 46 are provided as is best
evident in FIG. 4.
Means must be provided to advance and retract the abrasive wheel 24
from the workpiece 11 on occasion in accordance with normal
grinding machine operation. For this purpose, the base 13 is
provided with a sub-base 47, from which the pivot shaft 28 extends.
The sub-base is linearly slidable in the main base 13 by means of
guide ways 48, these ways being parallel in a horizontal plane to
the ways 46 and located between the portion 47 and the base 13 of
the machine. The relative position between the main base 13 and the
sub-base 47 is selectable by means of a feed screw 49 suitably
driven by the motor 30 mounted on the base 13. By the operation of
the feed screw 49, it is possible to move the workpiece 11 relative
to the abrasive wheel 24 to provide for the conventional feed
retraction, compensation after dress, and like grinding machine
movement of a conventional nature. Furthermore, the wheelhead 22 is
provided with the traversing means which are well known in the art
for introducing the abrasive wheel 24 longitudinally (vertically)
into the interior of the workpiece and to provide for reciprocation
on occasion. A dressing mechanism 52 is suitably mounted on the top
of the table 15 for renewing the surface of the wheel in the usual
way. Suitable flexible bellows 53 extend from the upper portions of
the table 15 to the edges of the base 13 to prevent foreign matter
from getting into the interior of the machine and particularly onto
the surface 14 of the base. A pneumatic cylinder 54 is provided for
biasing the table relative to the cam follower; in that respect it
acts like a constant force spring.
The operation of the invention will now be readily understood in
view of the above description. The workpiece 11 is mounted on the
workhead 17 for the grinding operation. Presumably, the surface 12
has been rough machined and the grinding operation by means of the
abrasive wheel 24 is a finishing operation. The wheelhead 22 is
moved vertically to introduce the abrasive wheel into the opening
in the workpiece in the usual way. This axial motion of the
wheelhead 22 and the abrasive wheel takes place by means of a slide
and a cylinder in the usual way. Lateral motion, however, is
brought about by moving the entire workhead assemblage laterally by
means of the motor 30 operating through the screw 49. This screw
brings about various advances and retractions of the wheel,
including motion necessary in order to dress by means of the
dressing mechanism 52. The motor 32 is energized and operates
through the gearing to rotate the workhead 17 in its bearing 18
relative to the table 15. The table 15, on the other hand, is
biased by the pneumatic cylinder 54, so that the surface 21 of the
master cam 19 presses continuously against the cam follower 25.
Since the cam follower 25 on its spindle 27 and the shaft 28 are
fixed to the base 13, the changes in distance of the surface 21 of
the master cam relative to the axis A-A cause the entire workhead
and table to move laterally relative to the abrasive wheel 24. This
lateral motion takes place by means of the ways 46 shown in FIG. 4.
If this were the only motion that took place in the cam grinder,
the abrasive wheel 24 would be either "climbing" or "falling" in
those areas of the epitrochoid surface that is to be formed. This
would mean that more or less material would be removed than
determined by the cam. For that purpose the suitably-formed cam 39
is provided to operate the link 29. This has the effect of swinging
the table 15 relative to the base 13 in the manner shown in dotted
lines in FIG. 2, which of course, is a gross exaggeration of the
actual amount that such swinging takes place. The net result is to
maintain the grinding wheel 24 always normal to the epitrochoid
surface, so that the surface speed of cutting, the forces, and all
the other grinding parameters remain the same. This brings about an
exact duplication of the master cam surface in a manner which is
independent of grinding wheel size variation from follower size.
Furthermore, if it turns out that the master cam surface is not
being exactly duplicated, a small change in the surface of the
secondary cam 39 can be made very easily to compensate for the
variations.
The advantages of the invention are quite clear. The chief
advantage is that the power enters the system to drive the
workpiece through smooth, continuous-mesh gearing, which means that
there is no wear of a driving roll and no slippage, as was
encountered with prior art devices. Even the modification of
movement provided by the link 29 are positive displacement
movements. There is no wearing of a drive roll which will change
the speed of the workpiece. Furthermore, extremely large amounts of
power can be transmitted to the workpiece, so that the grinding
operation takes place very rapidly. In the past, with friction type
drives, the amount of power that could be transmitted through the
small cam follower wheel was extremely limited; it was necessary to
use long grinding cycles which made the grinding operation
economically non-feasible.
FIG. 6 shows what happens when an ordinary crank is used in place
of the crank 29. It shows the increment of angular error that
results. In FIG. 7 by use of the cam 39 a satisfactory correction
is made by use of the cylinder 38 and the pilot valve 41 to give
normalcy with no angular error.
FIG. 8 shows how normality error occurs in the graph 60 when a
plane crank is used, while the normality error with no crank at
all, is shown in the graph 61. These are the errors which the
present invention seeks to overcome. FIG. 9 shows how the normality
error results in an error in geometry in the formation of the
epitrochoid. Graph 62 being the geometry error when no crank is
used at all and graph 63 showing the error when plain crank without
the correction cylinder 38 is used. FIGS. 10 through 16 are
electrical schematic, showing in general, the electrical apparatus
necessary to produce the grinding cycle. Many reference numerals,
such as the numeral 100, are used to indicate the free ends of
various wires or leads which are connected together to obtain the
overall electrical schematic. It was necessary, because of the
limitations of drawing space, to divide the electrical diagram into
the various parts.
FIG. 10, for instance, has a lead 100 for index to new wheel. A
lead 102 for index to roughing wheel and a lead 103 for index to
finishing wheel consists of a number of integrated circuits and
logic circuits also includes a lead 104 for new wheel position. A
lead 105 for roughing wheel position and a lead 106 for finishing
wheel position. From wheel switches 107 provided for determining
the new wheel position and a similar set of thumb-wheel switches
108 are provided for determining roughing wheel position. A four
decade storage register 109 is provided for determining finishing
wheel position. A four decade comparator 110 is also provided with
three lines 111, 112, and 113 which receive signals when A is
greater than B, A is equal to B and A is less than B,
respectively.
The portion of the control shown in FIG. 11 have a second size
override lead 122, a feed reset lead 123, and a first size override
lead 124. Various other lines extending from this portion of the
control bear the numbers 125 through 152.
FIG. 12 shows a compensate lead 153, as well as leads 154 and 155
associated with the feed slide. A portion of the circuitry contains
a two decade BCD down-counter 156. A safety timer 157, and a feed
system clock 158. A feed-mode line 159 extends from the
circuitry.
FIG. 13 has a second size retract lead 182, a first size retract
lead 183, a feed-mode lead 184 and a clock feed memory 185. The
circuitry includes a pick-feed timer 186 and a three decade
comparator 187. A number of thumb wheel switches are provided
including the second size retraction switch 188, a first size
retraction switch 189, a standard compensation switch 190, a course
compensation switch 191, a course pick 192, a fine pick 193 all
connected to a cable 181 leading to the two decade BCD down-counter
156 in FIG. 12. The comparator 187 is similarly provided with a
cable 194.
FIG. 14 contains a number of important elements including a decade
BCD to seven segment decoder/driver 198 and a cross-slide position
digital readout 199; includes a number of thumb wheel switches
including a wheel-wear switch 200, a wheel size switch 201, a
course compensation switch 202. Extending from the circuitry is a
wheel-wear output lead 203, a wheel size output lead 204, a course
compensation output lead 205, and a cross-slide zero output lead
206.
Referring now to FIG. 15, it can be seen that the controls
connecting with the cross-slide stepping motor 30, there being four
drivers 214, 215, 216, and 217 connected to it. In the circuitry of
FIG. 15 is a down-counter 218 in the form of a four decade BCD
up/down counter with retentive memory. Also, provided is a
pulse-two-step converter 219 and a three decade BCD up/down counter
220. Included in the circuitry also, is an auto reset timer 221,
there being from the counter 220 a cable 222.
Finally, the portion of the circuitry shown in FIG. 16 includes a
decoder/driver 223 in the form of a three decade BCD two seven
segment decoder/driver, as well as a feed position digital readout
224. There are several thumb wheel switches including a first size
switch 225, an intermediate size switch 226, and a second size
switch 227. Output leads include a feed reset output lead 228, a
first size output lead 229, an intermediate size output lead 230,
and a second size output lead 231.
The control system shown in FIGS. 10 through 16 are connected in
the usual way to the conventional grinding machine controls to
produce the motion indicated.
In the preferred embodiment grinding machines having the dimensions
indicated in FIG. 5, was used for grinding a Wankel housing, whose
surface to be ground had a silicon carbide/nickel plate which was
to be finished to exact size. The machine was loaded manually with
a power clamping of the workpiece onto the table. The vertical
slide moved the abrasive wheel down to the rough position and
started the work rotation at one rpm and indexed the diamond wheel
into grinding position. Creep feed was used for this portion of the
cycle. The next step was to feed the diamond wheel 0.005 inch to
0.006 inch for a rough grind with creep feed at one rpm occupying
about 25 horsepower for the cut for about 1.2 revolutions of the
workpiece. Next a semi-finish took place with the diamond wheel
with the work speed at 30 rpm and feeding approximately 0.001 inch.
Eight revolutions of the workpiece took place. Next an alternate
abrasive wheel on the same spindle in the form of a cylindrical
finishing wheel was indexed into grinding position by moving the
wheelhead vertically. The work clamp was released to relieve force
on thermal distortions and reclamped again. Finish grinding took
place for about 0.002 inch on diameter with a multi-dress. About
one-half reciprocation of the wheel took place and there was a
change of feed-rate from a first feed-rate to a second feed-rate by
use of an in-process gage. Finally, the finishing wheel was
retracted and the vertical slide was raised to the loading position
and the workhead rotation was stopped. The in-process gage was
retracted and loading took place of the new workpiece.
It is obvious that minor changes may be made in the form and
construction of the invention without departing from the material
spirit thereof. It is not, however, desired to confine the
invention to the exact form herein shown and described, but it is
desired to include all such as properly come with the scope
claimed.
* * * * *