U.S. patent number 3,699,389 [Application Number 05/090,969] was granted by the patent office on 1972-10-17 for patient electrode isolation.
Invention is credited to William Perry Holsinger.
| United States Patent |
3,699,389 |
| Holsinger |
October 17, 1972 |
PATIENT ELECTRODE ISOLATION
Abstract
A system for preventing the inadvertent electrocution of a
surgical patient through accidental coupling of probes and common
equipment to ground. Isolation of the patient from ground is
obtained through the use of a light emitting diode and a photo
transistor in the probe circuit.
|
Inventors: |
Holsinger; William Perry
(Vienna, VA) |
|
Assignee: |
|
| Family
ID: |
22225163 |
| Appl.
No.: |
05/090,969 |
| Filed: |
November 19, 1970 |
| Current U.S.
Class: |
361/1;
340/870.29; 128/908 |
| Current CPC
Class: |
A61B
5/301 (20210101); G01R 15/14 (20130101); Y10S
128/908 (20130101) |
| Current International
Class: |
A61B
5/0428 (20060101); A61B 5/0402 (20060101); G01R
15/14 (20060101); G08c 019/02 () |
| Field of
Search: |
;317/9R,18D,124
;128/2.1,2.6B ;340/189,190 ;330/3D,27P |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Other References
IEEE Transactions : Bio Medical Electronics, Vol. 17, No. 2 pp.
163-166, April 1970. .
"Medical and Biological Engineering" Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 447-448 Van
der Weide et al., Aug. 1968. .
"Medical and Biological Engineering" Vol. 8, pp. 103-105 Bracale et
al., 1970. .
"Medical and Biological Engineering" Vol. 8, pp. 207-208, Ross et
al., 1970..
|
Primary Examiner: Miller; J. D.
Assistant Examiner: Moose, Jr.; Harry E.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A patient electrode isolation circuit for preventing accidental
electrocution of a patient comprising
first, second, and third input means for receiving signals from
electrical equipment as might be used in the treatment of a
patient;
a first passive current limiting network connected between the
first and second input means, said network being a resistance and a
diode, said resistance preventing possible high voltage on the
first and second input means from breaking down the diode;
a second passive current limiting network connected between the
second and third input means, said network being a resistance and a
diode, said resistance preventing possible high voltage on the
second and third input means from breaking down the diode;
a first source follower series connected in the first input
means;
a second source follower series connected in the third input
means;
a third passive current limiting network connected between the
input of the first source follower and the second input means, said
network being a resistance and a diode, said diode being poled
oppositely from the diode in the first passive current limiting
network and the resistance preventing any excessive interelectrode
leakage in the first source follower from breaking down the
diode;
a fourth passive current limiting network connected between the
input of the second source follower and the second input means,
said network being a resistance and a diode, said diode being poled
oppositely from the diode in the second passive current limiting
network and the resistance preventing any excessive interelectrode
leakage in the second source follower from breaking down the
diode;
a differential amplifier connected to receive the outputs of the
first and second source followers;
a driver amplifier connected to receive the output of the
differential amplifier;
an optical coupler consisting of a diode and a phototransistor
connected to the output of the driver; and
output means connected to the phototransistor.
Description
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY
The present invention relates to isolation circuits and, more
particularly, to an isolation circuit with an optical arrangement
for decoupling an electrical surgical probe from ground.
There are only two ways that a patient can accidentally be
electrocuted when connected to electrodes while undergoing an
operation or a diagnostic examination. The first of these is
through interelectrode leakage or short circuits, where the
monitoring device leaks lethal currents between the electrodes. The
second is through coupling with other monitoring equipment, common
equipment grounding being the most common culprit. Both
possibilities must be eliminated, however, to guarantee patient
safety.
The hazard of interelectrode leakage can be eliminated by
series-connecting a passive current limiting network, i.e., one
that introduces no current of itself, between the electrodes and
the monitoring device.
The second cause of accidental electrocution is the most probable.
Whenever a patient is grounded, he is vulnerable to almost every
conceivable interaction between equipments, such as ground loop
currents, electromagnetically coupled transients, and even poor
hospital grounding techniques. It takes as little as 15
microamperes to set the heart muscle into fibrillation. This could
still occur even where using the aforementioned technique since the
ground connection to the patient cannot be current limited.
However, if the whole input amplification network were floating and
battery powered, this major cause would also be eliminated. FM
modulation and demodulation techniques suffer from critical
frequency controls and bulky component needs, and still do not
guard against coupled electromagnetic transients through the
transformer windings or leakage currents through transformers
leakage capacitances. OPtical isolation experiences no such
drawbacks and further allows wider frequency bandwidths using
practical components.
Thus, the present invention offers many improvements and
advancements over the weaknesses and drawbacks of prior systems.
The dual-function isolation technique disclosed herein is
inexpensive, compact, reliable, and even adaptable to existing
equipment. If all patient monitoring equipment were isolated in
this manner, accidental electrocution could never occur.
It is, accordingly, an object of the present invention to overcome
the defects of the prior art, such as indicated above.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a safe
environment to prevent electrocution.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a
device for isolating a patient, particularly during an operation or
a diagnostic evaluation, to prevent electrocution, which device is
inexpensive, compact, reliable and readily adaptable to various
equipment.
These and other objects and the nature and advantages of the
instant invention will be more apparent from the following detailed
description of a specific embodiment of the invention taken in
conjunction with the drawing wherein:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
The drawing shows a schematic diagram of the isolation
circuitry.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Referring now to the lone FIGURE of the drawing, which sets out a
schematic diagram of the invention, there are provided input
terminals 10, 11 and 12, these inputs furnishing signals from other
surgical test or diagnostic devices (not shown) in use during an
operation, such as intracavitary transducers, electronic probes and
the like. Connected to terminal 10 there is a resistance 13, while
a similar resistance 14 is tied to terminal 12; terminal 11, on the
other hand is connected with a junction point 20.
A pair of oppositely poled diodes 15 and 16 are tied between the
far end of resistance 13 and junction point 20, while another pair
of oppositely poled diodes 17 and 18 are located between the far
end of resistance 14 and junction 20. The output signal from
resistance 13 is applied to a series connected resistance 21 from
whence it is fed to an FET source follower amplifier 22. From
amplifier 22 the signal is impressed on series resistance 24 and
then to a differential amplifier 25, this amplifier having a
feedback loop to its input and including a resistance 26.
A parallel channel, similar to the one described above, includes a
series resistance 27 connected to the output terminal of resistance
14, the output of resistance 27 being applied to an FET source
follower amplifier 28. From amplifier 28 the signal goes through a
series resistance 30 before acting as a second input to
differential amplifier 25. A lone resistance 31 is tied between the
output end of resistance 30 and junction point 20. The output of
amplifier 25 is applied as one input to a driver amplifier and
drives 32 after passing through a series resistance 33. Feedback
loop 36 provides the necessary gain control while the other input
to amplifier 32 is connected to junction point 20.
Potential for the isolation network is supplied by two batteries 34
and 35; the positive terminal of battery 35 and the negative
terminal of battery 34 connecting to junction point 20.
The driver signal, as produced by amplifier 32, passes through a
dropping resistance 37 before being applied to an optical coupler
38, shown generally within the dotted lines. The return from
coupler 38 is connected to the negative terminal of batter 35.
The optical coupler 38 consists of a light emitting diode 41 and a
phototransistor 42. Positive potential is supplied to the
phototransistor by means of a lead 43 connected to one electrode,
while negative potential is furnished by lead 44 and resistance 45
connected to the output electrode of the phototransistor.
The output of the optical coupler, and therefore of the isolation
network, is furnished by an output terminal 46, connected to the
output electrode of the phototransistor 42, this output converted
from the infrared radiation generated by diode 41 acting as a
variable resistance to generate a proportional current for
subsequent amplification.
In operation the isolation network receives input signals on input
terminals 10, 11 and 12, as from intracavitary transducers, and
other surgical instruments, and electrically decouples or isolates
these signals before applying them to monitoring equipment via
output terminal 46. Interelectrode leakage, or short circuits,
where the monitoring device leaks lethal current between electrodes
is eliminated by series connecting a passive current limiting
network, or one that introduces no current of itself, between the
electrodes and the monitoring devices, and including such passive
network as a portion of the present overall isolation network.
Resistances 21 and 27 limit any current from the amplifiers 22 and
28 to a low enough value so as not to exceed the rating of diodes
15, 16, 17 and 18, even if full battery supply voltages were
short-circuited. Two diode pairs 15, 16, 17 and 18, reverse
connected, can handle either positive or negative voltages. Since
the junction of the diodes can never exceed .+-.0.7 volts
(silicon), 0.7 volts through resistances 13 and 14 limit
interelectrode current to 3.5 microamperes, which is sufficiently
low for safe connection even to intracavitary transducers. The high
200K input resistors 13 and 14 necessitate amplifiers 22 and 28 to
have very high input impedances (FET source follower) with
extremely low bias currents; otherwise the amplifiers could not
track the input waveforms. Diodes 15, 16, 17 and 18 must be fast
acting so as to dissipate the transient energy arising from a
defibrillator pulse. Here, the 200K input resistors 13 and 14 limit
the high voltage current.
The elimination of accidental coupling between monitoring and other
equipment, by forming a common ground, is accomplished by the
circuitry of the source follower amplifiers 22 and 28, differential
amplifier 25, driver amplifier 32 and optical coupler 38. Optical
isolation experiences none of the drawbacks of electromagnetic
coupling or interaction between components since electrical current
flow is broken by the beam of light. An operational amplifier 32
modulates the light emitting diode 41 and is biased sufficiently
far in the linear operating region to preserve signal fidelity.
Thus the emitted infrared radiation is optically coupled to a
phototransistor 42 which acts as a variable resistor to generate a
proportional current at its output terminal 46 for subsequent
amplification and use by monitoring equipment.
From the above description of the structure and operation of the
invention, it is obvious that the present device offers a number of
improvements over the drawbacks and shortcomings of prior art
isolation circuits. The device discloses a dual function isolation
technique that is inexpensive, compact, reliable and adaptable to
existing present day equipment. If all patient monitoring equipment
were isolated in this manner, accidental electrocution could never
occur.
Obviously many modifications and variations of the present
invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is
therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended
claims the invention may be practiced otherwise than as
specifically described.
* * * * *