U.S. patent number 3,660,175 [Application Number 05/071,526] was granted by the patent office on 1972-05-02 for method of manufacturing a magnetically anisotropic magnet body.
This patent grant is currently assigned to U.S. Philips Corporation. Invention is credited to Krijn Jacobus DE Vos, Pieter Aart Naastepad, Theodorus Henricus Carolus Van Melis.
| United States Patent |
3,660,175 |
| Van Melis , et al. |
May 2, 1972 |
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A MAGNETICALLY ANISOTROPIC MAGNET BODY
Abstract
A method of manufacturing anisotropic permanent magnets having a
composition 28 - 42 percent Co, 10 - 20 percent Ni, 6 - 10 percent
Al, 2 - 8 percent Cu, 4 - 10 percent Ti, remainder mainly Fe. The
anisotropy is induced in the alloy, possibly together with the
treatment in a magnetic field, by means of an elastic deformation
of the alloy below the segregation temperature T.sub.o. The result,
at least when T.sub.o is at least 25.degree. C higher than T.sub.c,
is a higher energy product of the magnet than could be achieved so
far.
|
Inventors: |
Van Melis; Theodorus Henricus
Carolus (Emmasingel, Eindhoven, NL), Naastepad;
Pieter Aart (Emmasingel, Eindhoven, NL), DE Vos;
Krijn Jacobus (Emmasingel, Eindhoven, NL) |
|
Assignee: |
U.S. Philips Corporation (New
York, NY)
|
| Family
ID: |
19807926 |
| Appl.
No.: |
05/071,526 |
| Filed: |
September 11, 1970 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
|
|
|
|
|
| Sep 18, 1969 [NL] |
|
|
6914126 |
|
| Current U.S.
Class: |
148/103; 148/101;
148/102 |
| Current CPC
Class: |
C22F
1/10 (20130101); H01F 1/04 (20130101); C22C
19/07 (20130101); C22C 38/105 (20130101) |
| Current International
Class: |
C22F
1/10 (20060101); C22C 38/10 (20060101); H01F
1/04 (20060101); H01F 1/032 (20060101); C22C
19/07 (20060101); H01f 001/04 () |
| Field of
Search: |
;148/100,101,102,103,31.57 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
817,702 |
|
Aug 1959 |
|
GB |
|
821,624 |
|
Oct 1952 |
|
GB |
|
1,085,934 |
|
Oct 1967 |
|
GB |
|
1,171,892 |
|
Nov 1969 |
|
GB |
|
Primary Examiner: Rutledge; Dewayne
Assistant Examiner: White; G. K.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A method of manufacturing a magnetically anisotropic body
consisting essentially of an alloy of about 28-42 percent Co, about
10-20 percent Ni, about 6-10 percent Al, about 2-8 percent Cu,
about 4-10 percent Ti, balance essentially Fe, comprising the steps
of cooling said alloy from a temperature of about 1,250.degree. C
at which the alloy is homogenized to a temperature T.sub.o, at
least 25.degree. C above the Curie temperature of the .alpha.'
phase and at which the alloy is split into two phases, .alpha.' and
.alpha., and elastically deforming said alloy from said temperature
T.sub.o to a temperature below said Curie temperature.
2. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the alloy is subjected
to treatment in a magnetic field below the Curie temperature of
.alpha.' phase.
3. A method as claimed in claim 1, the deformation takes place
between temperature T.sub.o and the Curie temperature of the
.alpha.' phase.
4. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the alloy consists of
oriented crystals and the deformation force is directed so that a
tensile stress is formed in the body in the easy axis of
magnetization.
Description
The invention relates to a method of manufacturing a magnet body
having anisotropic permanent magnetic properties of which the part
which is essential to said properties is an alloy on the basis of
Al-Ni-Co-Fe which, after homogenization is subjected to a thermal
treatment in which the homogeneous phase is split up into a phase
(.alpha.') which is rich in Fe-Co and a phase (.alpha.) which is
rich in Ni-Al, during which the alloy is elastically deformed
mechanically.
Such a method is known from British Pat. specification No. 817,702:
by elastically deforming by means of mechanical means during the
cooling process it is found possible to induce a magnetic
anisotropy in a given group of alloys on the basis of Al-Ni-Co-Fe.
The requirement is imposed upon such alloys that the Co-content be
less than 13 percent by weight.
The deformation in question is produced by means of mechanical
pressure or tensile forces. The resulting preferential direction
for the magnetic properties then is in the direction of the tensile
stress induced in the alloy.
As is known, an important advantage of magnetically anisotropic
magnet bodies with respect to magnetically anisotropic bodies is
that the maximum energy product, (BH).sub.max, of the permanent
magnet ultimately to be manufactured therefrom can be considerably
higher.
It has now been found experimentally that an above-mentioned
elastic deformation surprisingly also has the desirable result in
an important group of alloys which have a much higher Co-content
than the 13 percent by weight mentioned in the above British Pat.
specification No. 817,702, namely in alloys of the following
composition: 28-42 percent Co; 10-20 percent Ni; 6 - 10 percent Al;
2-8 percent Cu, 4-10 percent Ti, and the remainder mainly Fe, not
counting the additions of elements such as Ta, Nb, S, Sn, and so
on, normally used in said type of alloys.
Such alloys have been described, for example, in the Dutch Pat.
specification No. 97,469. It appears from this patent specification
that in magnet bodies consisting of such an alloy. a magnetic
anisotropy can be induced by subjecting the alloy at a temperature
below the Curie temperature (T.sub.c) to a thermal treatment in a
magnetic field. T.sub.c is always to be understood to mean the
T.sub.c of the .alpha.'-phase. Before being able to carry out said
thermal treatment, the alloy must first be cooled from the
temperature at which it was homogenized (for example, 1,250.degree.
C) to a temperature below said T.sub.c which is, for example,
approximately 850.degree. C. In this temperature range often lies
the temperature which is dependent upon the composition of the
alloy and below which segregation takes place of the homogeneous
phase into a phase .alpha.' which is rich in Fe - Co and a phase
.alpha. which is rich in Ni-Al. This is the segregation temperature
T.sub.o. This segregation which, when To > T.sub.c, begins
before an anisotropy can be induced in the alloy by means of a
thermal treatment in a magnetic field is, in as far as it takes
place above T.sub.c, undesirable for obtaining good magnetic
properties and can be prevented in known manner for the greater
part by causing the alloy to traverse the temperature range from
T.sub.o to T.sub.c rapidly.
By means of the above elastic deformation, however, a magnetic
anisotropy can be induced in the alloy, both at temperatures
between T.sub.o and T.sub.c (T.sub.o > T.sub.c) and below
T.sub.c. The result of this is that the (BH).sub.max product of a
permanent magnet manufactured from such a magnetic body is higher
than the (BH).sub.max product measured in a permanent magnet
manufactured from the same alloy in which the anisotropic magnetic
properties have been induced only by means of a thermal treatment
in a magnetic field and hence at a temperature below T.sub.c.
Essential for obtaining a higher (BH).sub.max product in this group
of alloys hence is that T.sub.o to be higher than T.sub.c. When
T.sub.o coincides with T.sub.c, or when T.sub.o < T.sub.c, this
higher (BH).sub.max product is reached already by means of the
above-mentioned thermal treatment in a magnetic field. In
particular an elastic deformation as mentioned above is found only
to be of advantage if T.sub.o is at least 25.degree. C higher than
T.sub.c.
In agreement with the above, the method according to the invention
is characterized in that it is applied to alloys of the
composition: 28 - 42 percent Co; 10 - 20 percent Ni; 6 - 10 percent
Al; 2 - 8 percent Cu, 4 - 10 percent Ti, the remainder mainly Fe,
not ocounting the additions of elements such as Ta, Nb, S, Sn, and
so on, normally used in said type of alloys, while the temperature
at which the homogeneous phase is split up into the phases .alpha.'
and .alpha. is at least 25.degree. C higher than the Curie
temperature of .alpha.' phase.
A permanent magnet manufactured by means of the method according to
the invention is found to have a higher remanence B.sub.r, and
hence a higher (BH).sub.max product. In addition it often has also
a higher coercive force H.sub.c than when no deformation has taken
place during the manufacture.
It is to be noted that the thermal treatment during which elastic
deformation is carried out can extend over a part of the
temperature range between T.sub.o and T.sub.r, throughout the range
T.sub.o - T.sub.c and over a range which terminates below T.sub.c.
(T.sub.O > T.sub.c) For example, it may also be an isothermal
treatment at a temperature below T.sub.o.
When the alloy has cooled to a temperature below T.sub.c, the
elastic deformation and the thermal treatment known per se in a
magnetic field can take place together to obtain a magnetic
anisotropy. It is also possible that the elastic deformation is
succeeded by a thermal treatment in a magnetic field.
An embodiment of the method according to the invention is therefore
characterized in that below the Curie temperature the deformation
is accompanied by or succeeded by a treatment in a magnetic
field.
An embodiment of the method according to the invention in
particular is characterized in that the deformation takes place
between the segregation temperature and the Curie temperature of
the .alpha.'-phase. Actually, in this temperature range it is not
possible to attain magnetic anisotropy by means of a magnetic
field.
It is to be noted that the use of the method according to the
invention particularly in alloys having a crystal orientation
results in a considerable gain in (BH).sub.max product. The
direction of the mechanical forces producing the deformation should
then be either perpendicular to -- a pressure force -- or parallel
to -- a tensile force -- the easy axis.
In order that the invention may be readily carried into effect, a
few examples of methods according to the invention will now be
described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawing.
EXAMPLE 1
An alloy of the composition:
32.0 percent Co, 17.5 percent Ni, 8.0 percent Al, 8.0 percent Ti,
2.5 percent Cu, remainder Fe, was homogenized at a temperature of
1,250.degree. C for 20 minutes. It was then blown cold by means of
compressed air (30 l. per minute) to approximately 650.degree. C
and then heated again to 835.degree. C. At this temperature the
resulting rod (diameter 20 mm, length 25 mm) of the alloy was
exposed to a magnetic field of 3,000 Oe for 20 minutes and then
cooled to room temperature at a rate of 1.5.degree. C/second. After
an annealing treatment at 650.degree. C for 16 hours, at
585.degree. C for 9 hours and at 550.degree. C for 15 hours, the
following magnetic values were measured:
(BH).sub.max =5.2.sup. . 10.sup. 6 GOe H.sub.c =1910 Oe B.sub.r
=7400 G.
A rod of the same alloy as mentioned above, after homogenization,
was subjected during the passage through the temperature range of
925.degree. C to 650.degree. C, to a pressure on all sides of
approximately 1,000 kg/sq.cm. The rod was then subjected to a
treatment identical to that to which the above-mentioned
non-deformed rod was subjected. The segregation temperature of the
alloy was 900.degree. C; the Curie temperature 860.degree. C. The
following magnetic properties were measured:
(BH).sub.max =5.8.sup. . 10.sup. 6 GOe H.sub.c =2020 Oe B.sub.r
=7530 G.
EXAMPLE 2
Starting material was an alloy of the same composition as that
described in example I. However, the rod of diameter 20 mm, length
25 mm showed a crystal orientation.
The alloy was homogenized at 120.degree. C for 20 minutes, then
cooled to 650.degree. C by means of compressed air, exposed to a
magnetic field of 3,000 Oe at 825.degree. C for 15 minutes and
finally annealed (at 650.degree. C for 2 hours and at 585.degree. C
for 20 hours).
The magnetic properties measured in the rod were:
B.sub.r =8720 G H.sub.c= 1905 Oe (BH).sub.max =8.2.sup. . 10.sup. 6
GOe.
A rod of the same alloy which also had crystal orientation was
subjected between 925.degree. C and 650.degree. C to a pressure on
all sides of approximately 1,000 kg/sq.cm, after which it was
subjected to the same treatment as above.
The measured magnetic properties were:
Br=9080 G H.sub.c =1960 Oe (BH).sub.max =9.3.sup. . 10.sup. 6
GOe.
EXAMPLE 3
Starting alloy: 34.5 percent Co; 14.5 percent Ni; 8.0 percent Al;
6.0 percent Ti; 2.5 percent Cu, remainder Fe. T.sub.o = 875.degree.
C; T.sub.c = 865.degree. C.
A rod (20 mm diameter, 25 mm long(of this alloy with crystal
orientation was homogenized at 1240.degree. C for 20 minutes, then
blown cold by means of compressed air to approximately 700.degree.
C and finally heated to 825.degree. C. At 825.degree. C the rod was
exposed to a magnetic field of 3,000 Oe for 20 minutes, then cooled
to room temperature and finally annealed (at 650.degree. C for 2
hours; at 585.degree. C for 20 hours).
The magnetic properties measured in the rod were:
B.sub.r =10,200 G H.sub.c =1,600 Oe (BH).sub.max =10.6.sup. .
10.sup. 6 GOe.
A rod of the same alloy which also showed crystal orientation was
subjected to a tensile stress of 700 kg/sq.cm after homogenization
during cooling in compressed air from 900.degree. C to room
temperature.
It was then subjected to a treatment equal to that of the
non-deformed rod as described above.
The measured magnetic properties were:
B.sub.r =10,050 G. H.sub.c =1,570 Oe. (BH).sub.max =10.4.sup. .
10.sup. 6 GOe.
So from this it appears that in an alloy of which T.sub.o is less
than 25.degree. C higher than T.sub.c, the method according to the
invention produces no effect.
EXAMPLE 4
Starting alloy: 38.0 percent Co; 15.0 percent Ni; 8 percent Al; 8.0
percent Ti; 30 percent Cu; 0.5 percent Sn; remainder Fe. T.sub.o =
925.degree. C; T.sub.c = 865.degree. C.
After homogenization at 1,240.degree. C for 20 minutes, cooling in
compressed air (30 l. per minute) to approximately 750.degree. C,
treatment in a magnetic field of 3,000 Oe for 20 minutes at a
temperature of 820.degree. C, cooling to room temperature at a rate
of approximately 0.8.degree. C/second and finally annealing (at
650.degree. C for 2 hours; at 585.degree. C for 20 hours), a
non-crystal-oriented rod (20 mm diameter, 30 mm long) was obtained
having the following magnetic properties:
B.sub.r =6720 G H.sub.c =1950 Oe (BH).sub.max =4.6.sup. . 10.sup. 6
GOe.
A rod of the same alloy which also showed no crystal orientation
was subjected during the cooling after homogenization between
920.degree. C and 750.degree. C to a pressure on all sides of
approximately 1,000 kg.sq.cm. The further treatment was identical
to that described above.
The measured magnetic properties:
B.sub.r =7400 G H.sub.c =2065 Oe (BH).sub.max =5.9.sup. . 10.sup. 6
GOe.
EXAMPLE 5
Starting alloy: the same as in example 4. This time, however, a rod
(20 mm diameter, 70 mm long) of the alloy showed a crystal
orientation. The treatment was further identical to that described
in example 4.
The measured magnetic properties without mechanical deformation
having taken place were:
B.sub.r =9200 G H.sub.c =1960 Oe (BH).sub.max =9.1.sup. . 10.sup. 6
GOe.
A rod of the above alloys was cooled to room temperature in
compressed air after homogenization. From 925.degree. C to room
temperature, the rod was exposed to a tensile stress of 700
kg/sq.cm. The rod was then subjected to the same treatment as
described in example 4.
The measured magnetic properties were:
B.sub.r =9750 G H.sub.c =1965 Oe (BH).sub.max =11.3.sup. . 10.sup.
6 GOe.
The curves in graph show the variation of the demagnetization of
the two permanent magnets according to example 5.
Curve 1 is associated with the magnet which has not been deformed
during manufacture. Curve 2 is associated with the magnet
manufactured by means of the method according to the invention.
It is found that when during cooling deformation is carried out,
the B.sub.r has increased, the demagnetization curve is "more
convex" and that also the H.sub.c is higher. From the curve it may
be concluded that the (BH).sub.max product will be larger than when
deformation according to the invention has not been carried
out.
* * * * *